<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick publishing for embryonic stem cell research (without embryos)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/11/21/quick-publishing-for-embryonic-stem-cell-research-without-embryos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/11/21/quick-publishing-for-embryonic-stem-cell-research-without-embryos/</link>
	<description>Here&#039;s my take on biotechnology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:51:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/11/21/quick-publishing-for-embryonic-stem-cell-research-without-embryos/comment-page-1/#comment-135108</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/11/21/quick-publishing-for-embryonic-stem-cell-research-without-embryos/#comment-135108</guid>
		<description>&lt;EM&gt;I was under the assumption that the publishing of papers in top of the line subscription journals like Nature, Cell and Science was a long and sluggish process that could take from months&lt;/EM&gt;

Quite the opposite -- as has been true for a long time.  The highest-profile journals almost always move faster than most of the second-tier journals.  That&#039;s one reason they &lt;EM&gt;are&lt;/EM&gt; high profile -- people who know they have a hot  story aren&#039;t afraid to send it to them.  What&#039;s more, Science and Nature and Cell will also listen to your requests to move quickly, if you tell them your competitors are about to publish elsewhere. (They won&#039;t necessarily accept your request, but they will listen.)  They don&#039;t want to get scooped any more than you do.

Again, these journals are top-tier journals because they publish the most exciting science.  It&#039;s exciting because it&#039;s out first.  The journals have a strong interest in getting things published before they are scooped; if they move slowly, top work gets sent elsewhere and the journal&#039;s prestige drops.

The 20-day turnaround here is unusual, but far from unique, even in the pre-electronic days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I was under the assumption that the publishing of papers in top of the line subscription journals like Nature, Cell and Science was a long and sluggish process that could take from months</em></p>
<p>Quite the opposite &#8212; as has been true for a long time.  The highest-profile journals almost always move faster than most of the second-tier journals.  That&#8217;s one reason they <em>are</em> high profile &#8212; people who know they have a hot  story aren&#8217;t afraid to send it to them.  What&#8217;s more, Science and Nature and Cell will also listen to your requests to move quickly, if you tell them your competitors are about to publish elsewhere. (They won&#8217;t necessarily accept your request, but they will listen.)  They don&#8217;t want to get scooped any more than you do.</p>
<p>Again, these journals are top-tier journals because they publish the most exciting science.  It&#8217;s exciting because it&#8217;s out first.  The journals have a strong interest in getting things published before they are scooped; if they move slowly, top work gets sent elsewhere and the journal&#8217;s prestige drops.</p>
<p>The 20-day turnaround here is unusual, but far from unique, even in the pre-electronic days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
