<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Venter Institute patenting synthetic life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/</link>
	<description>Here's my take on biotechnology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo Vidal</title>
		<link>http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/#comment-143133</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo Vidal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/#comment-143133</guid>
		<description>Not absolutely sure where I read that it was dubbed Synthia, but if you do a quick Google search for "Synthia +Venter" you'll find a bunch of other sources with that name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not absolutely sure where I read that it was dubbed Synthia, but if you do a quick Google search for &#8220;Synthia +Venter&#8221; you&#8217;ll find a bunch of other sources with that name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harijay</title>
		<link>http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/#comment-143132</link>
		<dc:creator>harijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/#comment-143132</guid>
		<description>Just curious..who called it Synthia..the original article didnt seem to have that name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious..who called it Synthia..the original article didnt seem to have that name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Biotech Life &#187; Sr. Anderson, mi genome es su genome!</title>
		<link>http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/#comment-59687</link>
		<dc:creator>My Biotech Life &#187; Sr. Anderson, mi genome es su genome!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/#comment-59687</guid>
		<description>[...] while back I wrote about Synthia and now a recent article published in Science shows some more of the remarkable work being done at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while back I wrote about Synthia and now a recent article published in Science shows some more of the remarkable work being done at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/#comment-25576</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/#comment-25576</guid>
		<description>So, basically they are trying to patent something that might not yet exist and by doing so, make the whole sandbox theirs to play with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, basically they are trying to patent something that might not yet exist and by doing so, make the whole sandbox theirs to play with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Beltrao</title>
		<link>http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/#comment-25529</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Beltrao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.biotechlife.net/2007/06/13/the-venter-institute-patenting-synthetic-life/#comment-25529</guid>
		<description>No step done that we know of. They did not actually show that they can make the bug. The patent is based on two papers where they did random transposon insertions to map (one by one) non essential genes. The claim of this invention is for a cell with the minimal set of genes required for life that, so far, has not been published or announced anywhere. 
What I dislike is not that they are trying to do this, is the patenting itself. It is so broad in wording that if by any chance they are able to uphold it in court it can really hinder any competition in synthetic biology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No step done that we know of. They did not actually show that they can make the bug. The patent is based on two papers where they did random transposon insertions to map (one by one) non essential genes. The claim of this invention is for a cell with the minimal set of genes required for life that, so far, has not been published or announced anywhere.<br />
What I dislike is not that they are trying to do this, is the patenting itself. It is so broad in wording that if by any chance they are able to uphold it in court it can really hinder any competition in synthetic biology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.260 seconds -->
