Comments on: Does Nivea’s DNAge do what it says?

By: Barry

Barry — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:43:44 +0000

Does DNage contain nano-particles? Hopefully it does not actually damage DNA and cause cancer and perhaps even accelerate skin aging when used over a long period of time. Please read below.
In a press release on April 17, 2007, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) reported research presented at the 2007 annual meeting that suggests nanoparticles could cause cancer and should be thoroughly investigated and used with caution. Researchers at the University of Massachusetts studied two types of nanoparticles (silica and C60 fullerene), in MCF-7 and breast cancer cells, and found an increase in DNA damage (single and double-stranded breakages) with both dose- and time-dependent results.

Although DNA breakages do not necessarily mean a substance is cancer-causing, it is widely accepted that chemicals causing DNA damage are highly likely to promote mutations which can lead to cancer.

By: Barry

Barry — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:31:22 +0000

There is good evidence that folate acts as a UV filter and is involved in DNA repair. In the absence of full disclosure of DNage active ingredients and their amounts not much one can say about mode of action. What can be said however is that unmetabolized folic acid may pose a health hazard. Lets do the testing properly and thoroughly to see how much of the vitamin enters the bloodstream how long it stays there and in what form. It is my view that it is irresponsible to do the experiment on millions of unsuspecting women.

By: Lisa

Lisa — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:05:05 +0000

The product is fantastic. I have used it consistently morning and night for about 4 months. The results are wonderful, skin texture, wrinkles and elasticity are all significantly improved.

By: angelque ray

angelque ray — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:37:36 +0000

misleading or not..advrtisemt…whatever…try it….really works!

By: Nathan

Nathan — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:16:46 +0000

I’m a R&D Chemist for the cosmetic, therapeutic and pharmaceutical industry. While I do not work for Nivea, Induchem nor do I have anything to do with their products, I happened upon this discussion while reading about industry products.

Nivea’s DNAge range uses an ingredient by the trade name of Unirepair T-43 (Acetyl Tyrosine, Proline, Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein, Adenosine Triphosphate in Butylene Glycol solvent), manufactured by Induchem. This ingredient, when used at prescribed level of 3% (1.5% to 3% advised), showed a 37% decrease in apparent redness of test subjects skin after 24 hours, and 52% after 48 hours, when compared to a placebo and exposed to UV radiation (1.25 x MED). The test subjects were all 27-58, male and female, with a skin phototype (Fitzpatrick)

While not foolproof, it is some scientific results to back up some creative marketing.

By: thatgirl

thatgirl — Sun, 09 Nov 2008 08:10:10 +0000

I have no idea about the so-called “science” behind this product – all I can say is that it is the ONLY line of products that I have had results with. I was actually part of an independent trial for the DNA Age range and honestly didn’t expect anything – at the very most, I thought “hey, if it at least adds moisture to my skin I’ll be happy” (particularly as I haven’t paid a cent for the product/s). Well, I’ve been using it (the night and day cream and eye cream) for only 3 days now and I can’t believe the difference – particularly to my eye area. I’m almost 40, but actually have very good skin – very few lines and my skin is in good condition, but I do have a few very fine lines under my eyes, along with slight puffiness and dark circles. This morning I noticed the lines have virtually disappeared, the puffiness has gone and the dark circles have greatly diminished. I’ve no idea if this is just a coincidence or not, but I can honestly say I would have no problems purchasing this line of products. I’ve purchased some of the most expensive products money can buy, along with the cheapest, and like I say this is the only product I’ve seen any results with. Just my opinion, and other people may not find they have the same results, but personally, I’m impressed.

By: Judy

Judy — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:14:44 +0000

This post is very useful for me because my friends mother is suffering from the Skin cancer. This would help me to tell some important caution about Skin cancer.
Thanks for your time to post this article.

By: LJ

LJ — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:11:17 +0000

Well I was their advertising dream and feel for the plumping effect of the DNage line filler. It did what it said so much so that I used it at least 3 times a day on the under eye area. Only to have a reaction to it a week later. My eyes became sore and swollen. I stopped using it and my eye area became so dry and since then the area below my eyes and the eyelids are crinkly and dry and have not returned to their normal state before I started using this product. There’s something in the product that makes your skin look worse if you stop using it…trust me. when I tried it agsin the are was replumped but the reaction also came back. My eyes have not looked the same since. I’m an idiot and wont be using their products any more or fall for their false advertising.

By: Kate

Kate — Fri, 23 May 2008 05:24:16 +0000

has anyone actually considered the absorption pathway of folic acid. Isnt it true that folate much be digested and absorbed within the gastrointestinal tract for it to be active within the body. Topical applications of folate couldnt possibly work as this form of folate is not active and cannot be absorbed into its correct metabolic pathways through epithleial skin tissue.

By: Mihai Grigori

Mihai Grigori — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:56:53 +0000

“Nivea protects your DNA”…

What the f**k is this !?
Seems like nivea is really relying on morons for buying their sh*t. You have to be dramatically stupid to buy and buy what they’re selling.
These commercials should be banned – if not for false advertising at least for…